I have been playing around with Kotlin and I am liking it more and more. Its cleaner, less verbose, more functional adn comes with many advanced features. I will list down few with short examples
Kotlin vs Java Comparison
✅ Kotlin vs Java: A Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Kotlin is a modern, expressive programming language fully interoperable with Java and designed to overcome many of Java’s limitations. Here’s a detailed comparison of Kotlin’s key features versus Java, including advanced language capabilities.
🚀 1. Null Safety
Kotlin:
var name: String = "John"
name = null // Compile-time error
Java: All object references are nullable by default. Null safety relies on careful programming or external tools like Optional.
🧵 2. Concise Syntax
Kotlin:
val list = listOf("A", "B", "C")
Java:
List<String> list = Arrays.asList("A", "B", "C");
📦 3. Data Classes
Kotlin:
data class User(val name: String, val age: Int)
Java: Manual creation or use of tools like Lombok.
🔗 4. Extension Functions
Kotlin:
fun String.isEmail(): Boolean {
return this.contains("@")
}
Java: No extension functions; you must use utility classes.
🧬 5. Coroutines for Async Programming
Kotlin:
suspend fun fetchData() = coroutineScope {
// Async non-blocking work
}
Java: Uses CompletableFuture, which is more verbose and harder to manage.
📐 6. Smart Type Inference
val name = "Alice" // Inferred as String
Java: Type inference is limited and available only from Java 10+ using var.
🛠️ 7. Default and Named Arguments
Kotlin:
fun greet(name: String = "Guest") {
println("Hello, $name!")
}
Java: Requires method overloading. Named arguments not supported.
🔒 8. Sealed Classes
Kotlin:
sealed class Result
class Success(val data: String) : Result()
class Error(val message: String) : Result()
Java: Supported only in Java 17+ using sealed keyword.
🔁 9. Functional Programming Support
Kotlin: Native support with lambdas, higher-order functions, etc.
Java: More verbose functional style introduced in Java 8.
🔄 10. Interoperability with Java
Kotlin: Can call Java code seamlessly and vice versa.
Java: Can interact with Kotlin (compiled to bytecode), but tooling is better from Kotlin to Java.
🔍 Additional Advanced Kotlin Features
🧾 Type Aliases
typealias UserMap = Map<String, List<User>>
⏱ Lazy Initialization
val config by lazy {
loadConfiguration()
}
🧷 Delegated Properties
var name: String by Delegates.observable("<no name>") { _, old, new ->
println("Changed from $old to $new")
}
🧩 Destructuring Declarations
val (name, age) = User("Alice", 25)
🛡 Safe Call (?.) and Elvis Operator (?:)
val length = name?.length ?: 0
📊 Summary Table
| Feature | Kotlin | Java |
|---|---|---|
| Null Safety | ✅ Built-in | ❌ Not safe by default |
| Concise Syntax | ✅ Yes | ❌ Verbose |
| Data Classes | ✅ One-liner | ❌ Manual / Lombok |
| Extension Functions | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Coroutines | ✅ Yes | ❌ Limited |
| Type Inference | ✅ Yes | ✅ (Java 10+) |
| Default/Named Args | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Sealed Classes | ✅ Yes | ✅ (Java 17+) |
| Functional Features | ✅ Native | ✅ Limited |
| Interop with Java | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Kotlin-compatible |
| Type Aliases | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Lazy Initialization | ✅ by lazy | ❌ Manual |
| Delegated Properties | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Destructuring | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Safe Call / Elvis | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
🧠 Conclusion
Kotlin offers a more modern, expressive, and safer syntax compared to Java, while maintaining complete interoperability. If you’re starting a new project—especially for Android or backend APIs—Kotlin is often the more productive and maintainable choice.
For a long time I have been thinking about writing a sample program in Rust “the” new systems language. I have done coding in C++ for initial 5 years of my career before I moved on completely to Java and recently in one of my products a requirement came up that a low latency high performance component had to be developed.



